Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Cornballs Get Stonewalled
837
   |
Posted - 2014.07.05 21:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
So playing logistic again and I should have just went back to that role from the vehicle refund like I thought and planned to do but I re-invested in vehicles again , even giving the bland look on paper and once experiencing ... it did not disappoint .
People can talk about their past OP'ness and all but , that was a drastic change and a boring one as well .
Loss of modules , the best skill tree , functionality , choice , customization , fun and a good production for your skill points .
It became boring .
Seeing all of these random HAV users getting a hundred to none on the payout from zero skill point investment was a joke and don't get me wrong , there were many times where I wish I had help during 1.5 ish .. 6 and it seemed like most had forges and swarms ( which I do but just didn't understand the recent back and forth but this is theDust 514 Forum .. well slash legion now sad to say and I say that because I admit there was lacking in the anti-vehicle area but that was because of the randomness of killing people with militia swarms and that was like HAV's were , with zero investment ) but many didn't drive HAV's and when a REAL skilled vehicle like an Enforcer hit the field , most just went to swarming and forging .
There were going to be changes but it's still a work in process as we speak .
I would love to see the militia and standard ground vehicle come into play along with at least the dropships as well .
I would have wanted a refund ( Not like that would happen ) if the changes would have not happen .
I anti-vehicle with forges and swarms along with other tools so , seeing all the HAV's gave me joy . It would be nice to have skill points stand for something in a role , which is part of the reason that I would have LOVED an infantry refund like what was given to vehicle users ( not that I'm saying that I regret what I did .. but prob would have if they didn't change what they did and now they should look at the hardener scale to adjust that and most would be good ) because I would have focused .. he he  focused .. like a " laser focus " on the role that I play and not multiple roles but I'm sure that would have happened at some point but to have point scattered everywhere and this was to function and don't get me wrong ... I use a lot but there are just something's that just collect " Dust " from zero usage .
I missed playing Logi but they are just paper thin .
Min series , 6 sum odd hundred hit points were set on fire by a random militia ar without reloading the clip and I was using a GB-9 and please save the " get good " but they should have a one percent increase of equipment efficacy per level and not just individual racial bonus . I see why you did that but you didn't give the refund to go along so that players could go full racial and I for one could do nothing as a Caldari and using a Gal AR ( I'm talking about Cal Assault ) that negates my skill points , yes the weapons came out but what if that was my weapon of choice and now I'm being forced to use something that I just can't perform with like the item that I'm familiar with because my bonus goes to rail-rifles .
The bonuses should go to the performance of the role and not to marginalize the battlefield threw racial bonuses but I can see why you do it .
They should also have the one HP given back because they are the most visible and opportune target and they need some survivability . This should also be given to the Assault class as well because threw their bonus in reduction of weapons power usage , which would allow for one to have power threw mods and that was key but they have no survivability . I always thought that what made " slayer logi's " what they were , should have been given to Assaults and that was the one hit point regen and the modular efficacy bonuses but you went a different route .
Complain about reading this if you like , if you did well thank you and sorry about it being long and drawn out and still have more but ... whatever .
Thanks for the vehicle changes now listen to those who use them and follow threw .
We need five consecutive months with events like this one with the skill point payout .
You would think that CCP would have given the infantry refund that should have been in 1.8.
|